At mirrorlesscomparison.com:
Sony 35mm f/1.8 vs. Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN vs. Sigma 30mm f/2.8 DN A – The complete comparison
I ended up picking the Sony E 35mm f/1.8 over the Sigma 30mm f/1.4. This is solely based on my wish to keep my A6000 longer as I don't want another camera for now and this prime with OSS is more suited for me when I go for video or single lens out. I know in photos, I may prefer the faster speed and sharpness in the Sigma 30mm f/1.4. If money is not a matter, I will actually get both and sell my Sigma 30mm f/2.8.
by Hin Man, on Flickr
by Hin Man, on Flickr
by Hin Man, on Flickr
by Hin Man, on Flickr
I really like my purchase with Sony E 35mm f/1.8 but I have some difficult time in MF with this lens, I need more practice with focus by wire. Perhaps I should try DMF instead of MF. This lens works great in video with OSS for me.
by Hin Man, on Flickr
by Hin Man, on Flickr
by Hin Man, on Flickr
All shots were taken with A6000 in a spring break vacation in Las Vegas and nearby national and state parks. The bokeh is nice and very similar to the E 50mm f/1.8. I find it extremely good in portrait and travel light as a single lens to use. If it is in 30mm wider focal length, it will even be more useful.
1 comments:
Choosing between the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 and Sony E 35mm f/1.8 depends on your priorities: the Sigma offers faster speed and excellent sharpness, while the Sony is smaller, lighter, and has OSS, which is great for video on your A6000. For casual video and single-lens use, the Sony 35mm f/1.8 is more practical despite slightly lower speed. Image quality favors the Sigma slightly for photos, but OSS gives the Sony an edge for handheld video. Many photographers choose based on future needs rather than just current performance. Similarly, if you’re busy with studies, you can save time and do my assignment cheap with reliable online services.
Post a Comment